Why may Bitcoin be its most affordable in nearly two years, according to new market data?

Bitcoin may look more affordable because its price has fallen to about half of its October 2025 record high. New market data also shows lower inflation pressure, renewed ETF inflows, large-holder accumulation, and reduced exchange balances, which may support the case for a recovery.

Still, a lower price does not automatically mean Bitcoin is undervalued or close to a bottom. The cryptocurrency remains volatile, and investors could face additional losses if demand weakens, interest rates stay high, or large holders begin selling.

Why does Bitcoin suddenly look affordable?

Bitcoin looks more affordable because its market price has fallen sharply from its recent record. The cryptocurrency traded around $64,000 in mid-July 2026 after reaching approximately $126,000 in October 2025.

That decline represents a drop of almost 50%, placing Bitcoin near its lowest level in nearly two years. Investors who avoided buying near the peak can now gain the same amount of exposure for much less money.

The word “affordable,” however, can create the wrong impression. Bitcoin is cheaper than it was several months ago, but a lower price does not confirm that it offers good value or limited downside.

An asset can lose half its value and continue falling if demand remains weak. It can also recover quickly if buyers return, liquidity improves, and investors regain confidence in riskier assets.

Bitcoin’s decline has also made spot Bitcoin ETFs appear more accessible. Shares of the VanEck Bitcoin ETF and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF now trade at lower prices because both funds follow the underlying cryptocurrency.

Investors do not need to purchase an entire Bitcoin or even a full ETF share at brokerages that offer fractional investing. The more useful question is how much of a portfolio someone can expose to Bitcoin without taking more risk than they can handle.

Is Bitcoin cheaper or truly undervalued?

Bitcoin is clearly cheaper than its record price, but the available data does not prove that it is undervalued. A price comparison shows how far the asset has fallen, while valuation measures attempt to show whether the market price is high or low compared with investor cost bases.

One measure often used by cryptocurrency analysts is the market value to realized value ratio, known as MVRV. It compares Bitcoin’s current total market value with an estimate based on the price at which each coin last moved.

A high MVRV ratio can indicate that investors are sitting on large unrealized gains. That may increase selling pressure because more holders can take profits without selling below their original purchase prices.

A lower ratio suggests that speculative gains have been reduced and that investors are holding less unrealized profit. Extremely low readings have appeared during previous bear-market periods, although no single number can reliably identify a market bottom.

The distance from Bitcoin’s record high is therefore only one part of the affordability argument. Investors should also examine realized value, trading volume, ETF demand, holder behavior, exchange balances, and broader financial conditions.

This distinction matters because “cheaper” describes a price change, while “undervalued” makes a judgment about future potential. Bitcoin may offer more attractive upside than it did at $126,000, but that opportunity comes with the possibility of another major decline.

What does the latest market data show?

The latest data presents a mixed but slightly more hopeful picture for Bitcoin. Cooler inflation, renewed ETF demand, and reported buying by large holders have provided support, while weak yearly returns and unstable flows continue to limit confidence.

Bitcoin briefly climbed above $65,000 in July after a cooler-than-expected inflation report. Investors viewed the data as a possible sign that the Federal Reserve may not need to maintain restrictive interest rates for as long as previously feared.

Lower rates can support Bitcoin because they reduce the appeal of some cash investments and improve financial conditions. Easier policy can also encourage investors to accept more risk in stocks, cryptocurrencies, and other volatile assets.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $181 million in net inflows after the inflation report, reversing a recent pattern of withdrawals. One positive session is encouraging, but several weeks of steady inflows would provide stronger evidence that institutional demand is returning.

Large Bitcoin holders have also reportedly accumulated significant amounts of the cryptocurrency during the decline. The supplied market analysis estimated that whale wallets added about 270,000 Bitcoin over two weeks, although large blockchain transfers do not always represent purchases.

Some transfers may reflect exchange maintenance, new custody arrangements, internal wallet movements, or over-the-counter transactions. Whale activity can support a recovery argument, but it should not be treated as proof that sophisticated investors expect an immediate rally.

Which Bitcoin ETF may offer better value?

HODL may have a small cost advantage for long-term holders, while IBIT may be more attractive to investors who value scale and trading liquidity. Both funds hold Bitcoin and aim to reflect its market performance after expenses.

The VanEck Bitcoin ETF lists a standard expense ratio of 0.20%, while the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF charges 0.25%. That difference equals about $5 a year on a $10,000 investment before considering temporary fee waivers or other trading costs.

VanEck has also offered a temporary sponsor fee waiver on a portion of HODL’s assets. Investors should check the official fund page before purchasing because a temporary promotion can change the actual cost during a specific period.

IBIT has a much larger asset base and heavier trading activity than HODL. That scale may produce narrower bid-ask spreads and make it easier for active traders or large investors to enter and exit positions.

HODL’s lower share price does not mean the fund provides cheaper Bitcoin exposure. VanEck completed a share split, and share splits reduce the price of each share without changing the total value of an investor’s position.

Investors should focus on expense ratios, trading spreads, fund size, tracking results, and brokerage access rather than the sticker price of one share. For smaller long-term positions, the return of Bitcoin itself will probably matter far more than a fee difference of 0.05 percentage points.

What could push Bitcoin higher from here?

Bitcoin could move higher if ETF inflows continue, inflation cools, the Federal Reserve signals lower rates, and long-term holders keep coins away from exchanges. A combination of stronger demand and limited available supply would create more favorable conditions for a sustained recovery.

Declining exchange balances may indicate that investors are moving Bitcoin into long-term storage. When fewer coins are immediately available for sale, new demand can have a larger effect on price.

Large-holder accumulation could add to that pressure if the transactions represent genuine purchases. Whales often use private custody and over-the-counter markets, allowing them to build positions without causing an immediate price increase on public exchanges.

Regulatory progress could also improve sentiment. Clearer rules for cryptocurrency trading, custody, stablecoins, and financial institutions may encourage additional participation from investors who have avoided the market because of legal uncertainty.

The Federal Reserve remains another important factor. Bitcoin may benefit if policymakers become more comfortable lowering interest rates, but renewed inflation or higher energy prices could delay that shift.

Bitcoin would still need consistent buying rather than one-day reactions to economic news. Lasting strength would be more convincing if ETF demand, spot trading volume, long-term holding, and broader market liquidity all improved at the same time.

What risks could make Bitcoin even cheaper?

Bitcoin could become much cheaper if ETF outflows resume, large holders take profits, exchange deposits rise, or financial conditions remain tight. Its recent decline has improved the entry price, but it has not removed the risks that caused the sell-off.

A 50% decline requires a 100% gain to return to the starting point. Bitcoin falling from $126,000 to $63,000 would need to double before investors who bought at the peak recovered their losses.

ETF investors also face limits that direct Bitcoin holders do not. Bitcoin trades around the clock, while U.S.-listed ETFs trade mainly during stock-market hours, leaving shareholders unable to react immediately to weekend or overnight price moves.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs remove the challenge of managing private keys, but investors do not own transferable Bitcoin. They gain brokerage convenience while giving up direct control, network access, and continuous trading.

Regulatory changes, geopolitical conflict, exchange failures, and unexpected inflation can also hurt demand. These events may cause investors to move into cash, reduce leverage, or sell speculative assets during periods of market stress.

Bitcoin may be more affordable than it was at its peak, but it is not safer simply because the price is lower. Investors should judge affordability by the loss their portfolio could absorb, not by the price of one coin or the hope that a past high will soon return.

TL;DR

• Bitcoin recently traded near $64,000, almost 50% below its reported October 2025 high of about $126,000.
• Cooler inflation data, possible Federal Reserve rate changes, renewed ETF inflows, and large-holder activity have encouraged hopes that Bitcoin may be recovering.
• A lower price makes Bitcoin cheaper than it was at its peak, but it does not prove that the cryptocurrency is undervalued or has reached its lowest point.
• Spot Bitcoin ETFs such as IBIT and HODL offer easier access, but investors should compare fees, liquidity, tracking results, and fund structure instead of share prices alone.
• Whale purchases and falling exchange balances may reduce available supply, although wallet transfers do not always represent real buying.
• Bitcoin remains highly volatile, and investors should measure affordability by possible portfolio losses rather than the price of one coin or ETF share.

This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.

If you liked this, you might also like:

• Why could CleanSpark’s $20 billion technology partnership reshape its long-term growth plans?
• What could Ethereum’s new privacy initiative mean for developers and investors alike?
• Could the SBI Holdings and Solana alliance drive wider adoption of blockchain services?