6 min read
Circle Internet Group is back in the spotlight, and not entirely for good reasons. The company, which operates the widely used USDC stablecoin, has found itself at the center of a growing storm after reports emerged that Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, and potentially Coinbase are working together on a rival stablecoin platform.
That single piece of news was enough to send the stock tumbling and reignite the debate about whether CRCL is worth the price investors have been paying.
The new payments consortium is not just another startup trying to break into crypto. Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe are global payment giants with direct access to card networks, millions of merchants, and billions of consumer transactions every year.
Their reported collaboration on a stablecoin platform represents something the industry has not seen before, which is a coordinated effort by traditional financial heavyweights to enter the dollar-linked digital payments space. That makes it a fundamentally different kind of competitor for Circle compared to anything it has faced before.
What makes this even more complicated is the potential involvement of Coinbase. Coinbase has historically been one of Circle’s closest partners, playing a key role in distributing and supporting USDC across crypto markets.
If Coinbase joins this rival consortium, it would not just add a new competitor to the market but could also disrupt the existing alliances and revenue-sharing arrangements that Circle has relied on to grow its business. Investors watching this space will need to pay close attention to any official announcements from Coinbase about which side of this competition it chooses.

The numbers tell a sobering story. Circle’s stock has fallen over 20% in the past 30 days, and the 7-day share price return has been negative at roughly 23.5% following the news of the rival stablecoin plans. Over a full year, the total shareholder return is down more than 30%, which means the initial excitement following the company’s IPO has largely faded.
For a stock that many had once seen as a way to get exposure to the growing digital payments infrastructure space, that kind of decline demands a serious reassessment.
It is worth noting that the stock has shown some volatility in both directions. An earlier snapshot from May 2026 showed a 7% single-day drop, while the 90-day return was close to double.
That kind of erratic movement suggests the market has not yet made up its mind about how to price this company, swinging between optimism about Circle’s infrastructure role and fear about the competitive risks it now faces. Any investor considering CRCL right now is essentially betting on which of those two narratives wins out.
Several independent valuation models suggest that CRCL may be trading well above what the fundamentals support. The most widely followed community narrative, authored by analyst Felix11, places Circle’s fair value at approximately $35.82 per share.
With the stock recently trading at prices ranging from around $80 to over $113 during different periods in 2026, that implies the stock could be anywhere from 124% to over 200% overvalued, depending on when you look. That is a striking gap between market price and estimated intrinsic value.
The Simply Wall St DCF model arrives at a similar conclusion, placing fair value at roughly $36.59, which is once again far below where the stock has been trading. Both models point in the same direction, and while models are never perfect, when two very different approaches reach the same conclusion, it is worth paying attention.
The core argument behind the overvaluation thesis is that Circle’s earnings profile today looks very different from the one priced into the stock, with a lot of future growth already baked in before it has actually arrived.

Circle operates a platform and infrastructure network built around stablecoins and blockchain applications. Its main product, USDC, is a dollar-pegged digital currency widely used across crypto exchanges, trading platforms, and wallets around the world.
The company reports annual revenue of around $2.75 billion, almost entirely from data processing, all of which is currently attributed to the United States market. However, the company also reported a net income loss of approximately $69.5 million, which means it is still not profitable despite generating billions in revenue.
The key insight that changes how investors should think about this company is that Circle is increasingly being understood not as a pure crypto play but as a rate-sensitive financial infrastructure company. Much of Circle’s revenue is tied to interest income generated from the reserves backing USDC.
When interest rates are high, those reserves generate more income, and Circle’s numbers look much better. When rates fall, that income shrinks fast, and the entire revenue model gets squeezed. This makes Circle’s outlook deeply intertwined with decisions made by the Federal Reserve, not just with developments in the crypto world.

The honest answer is that this is one of the more complicated calls in the market right now. On the one hand, analyst price targets sit meaningfully above the current trading price, with a consensus target around $131 to $145, suggesting Wall Street still sees upside from current levels.
On the other hand, two separate valuation models put fair value below $37, insider selling has been flagged as a risk, and the company now faces a coordinated competitive threat from some of the most powerful names in global payments.
The most sensible approach for anyone watching this stock is to track a few key data points closely over the coming months. These include USDC transaction volumes and market share trends, any official announcement from Coinbase about joining or not joining the rival consortium, interest rate decisions from the Fed, and whether Circle can demonstrate a path to consistent profitability.
The upside case is real but requires a lot to go right. The downside risks have clearly grown, and the stock’s high valuation relative to current earnings leaves very little room for error.
This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.
If you liked this, you might also like:
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!